- 23 Oct 2009 07:55
#13208791
I don't think I've called myself "moral", have I?
1) No, I would not have
2) Jesus was not homosexual
I'm a sinner. I always was, and I always will be. I cannot save myself. I will not become "moral". Even if I thought I was, there would always be "people" like you saying that I wasn't.
And my clear, focused judgement of what I read in the article has nothing to do with my religion, Christ Himself, or morality. The bicycle rider fucked up. If I wept for him and knashed my teeth it would change nothing, and it would not make me any more "moral".
"Religious" and "rational" people needing or desiring money and/or power isn't a problem, is it?
Would you prefer "irreligious" and "irrational" people always getting the money and power?
Just what will please you? No money and power whatsoever? Is that reality?
Nobody "let" the cyclist get squished under the wheels of power.
The idiot grabbed the car in an attempt to assault the driver, and the driver killed the fool with the car.
Wealth = aggressiveness > physical attack = aggressiveness?
He doesn't need to. The idiot already had a police report filed on his dumb ass that evening before he attacked the AG's car. It was documented that he had been drinking. His girlfriend called the authorities on his dumb ass.
You think (pray) that a former AG for the province will get hung for "defending himself"?
I'm only opining on what I read and what you write, which don't mesh.
Huntster, it seems that your "morality" is just a cartoon book of slogans and historical contexts that you can't really put together into anything meaningful or useful in living a good, moral life.
I don't think I've called myself "moral", have I?
You would have killed Jesus yourself and called him a loudmouth loser faggot.
1) No, I would not have
2) Jesus was not homosexual
And yet you spout out rehashed Middle English and archaic prose to sound like you have something to believe in that is more sophisticated than "might makes right." But in practice, you have no real developed moral guide. Your morality has been put on ice.
I'm a sinner. I always was, and I always will be. I cannot save myself. I will not become "moral". Even if I thought I was, there would always be "people" like you saying that I wasn't.
And my clear, focused judgement of what I read in the article has nothing to do with my religion, Christ Himself, or morality. The bicycle rider fucked up. If I wept for him and knashed my teeth it would change nothing, and it would not make me any more "moral".
It's not just you, most supposedly "religious" or "rational" people are really money-worshiping power accumulators because they're afraid anything else will doom them to suffering.
"Religious" and "rational" people needing or desiring money and/or power isn't a problem, is it?
Would you prefer "irreligious" and "irrational" people always getting the money and power?
Just what will please you? No money and power whatsoever? Is that reality?
So it's better to let cyclists get squished under the wheels of power.
Nobody "let" the cyclist get squished under the wheels of power.
The idiot grabbed the car in an attempt to assault the driver, and the driver killed the fool with the car.
It takes less effort than defending the less aggressive which - in this case - means the less wealthy of the two.
Wealth = aggressiveness > physical attack = aggressiveness?
That former-attorney-general has enough money and connections to buy the police and the media.
He doesn't need to. The idiot already had a police report filed on his dumb ass that evening before he attacked the AG's car. It was documented that he had been drinking. His girlfriend called the authorities on his dumb ass.
You think (pray) that a former AG for the province will get hung for "defending himself"?
But you're only to happy to go along and bash someone who is not dead.
I'm only opining on what I read and what you write, which don't mesh.