Football and Soccer - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Sports, Hobbies and all things unrelated to Politics.

Moderator: PoFo The Lounge Mods

User avatar
By Oxymoron
#13847184
Listen your european wankers, if you want to talk about a "sport" Where you kick balls around and act like lil bitches call it soccer. If you want to talk about a real sport call it football. that is all.
#13847206
If you have a great sport there Oxy, it should overtake the term 'football' internationally, right?

Honestly, I don't know why Americans keep this feud on. American Football doesn't use feet at almost all time and European Football was there long before it( although football came after rugby). Also, real football is a lot more dangerous than an average sport. My bro had to undergo multiple knee surgeries and he wasn't even playing in an amateur league.
User avatar
By Daktoria
#13847231
When you boil football down, it's 45 seconds between plays, plays which don't often last longer than 15 seconds themselves.

That means out of the 60 minutes of gameplay (and 3 hours games are usually scheduled for on TV), you end up with 15 minutes MAX of actual athleticism.

On top of that, you have different squads who play offense and defense (not to mention you have regular substitutes for different formations and special teams), so it's 7.5 minutes on average for a first string player per game.

I don't like foot fairies flopping around either, but 7.5 minutes doesn't show much for endurance. The specialization of positions doesn't go to show for much dexterity either.

Rugby anyone?
#13847232
Even the Germans admit that it should properly be called, "soccer:"

Der Spiegel wrote:But as much as the world likes to mock Americans for their ignorance of the beautiful game, football just isn't the correct term for it in English. Soccer is right.

The world comes from 19th-century British slang for “Association Rules” football, a kicking and dribbling game that was distinct from “Rugby rules” football back when both versions were played by British schoolboys. The lads who preferred the rougher game popular in schools like Rugby and Eton seceded from Britain’s fledgling Football Association in 1871 to write their own rules, and soon players were calling the two sorts of football “rugger” and “soccer.”

“The main dispute,” writes the Australian historian Bill Murray in "The World’s Game: A History of Soccer," “was over handling (the ball) and hacking (or kicking)” each other. When rugby players seceded from the Football Association, one English club “wanted to retain hacking, claiming that its abolition threatened the essential ‘manliness’ of football, and sneered that such sissy reforms would reduce the game to something more suited to the French.”

The dispute traveled overseas to elite American schools. North American boys played two kinds of “football” until a decisive three-game series in 1874 between Harvard and Montreal’s McGill University. Harvard played the “Boston game,” which was like soccer; McGill played rugby. “The Harvard team was surprised when the McGill players kicked the ball and subsequently ran with it under their arms,” according to a page on the McGill University Web site. “The Harvard captain pointed out politely that this violated a basic rule of American football. The McGill captain replied that it did not violate any rules of the Canadian game.”

The teams decided to play by one set of rules, and then another. Harvard players thought handling the ball was fun. A year later they convinced Yale to play something closer to rugby, and “American football” became a tradition.


Further, the British were calling it "soccer" on official documents until the 70s. Even before then, Gaelic Football had to be legally called "football" by the English from way back when - so in reality, if anything is called football that's what it should be.

But does it matter? The game sucks, I'm not going to change anybody's mind and nobody's going to change mine.

Though, it is hilarious when the Brits try to act all know-it-all about their awesome word they're using incorrectly.
#13847256
IIRC football is just a generic term that is played with a ball on your feet... played by peasantry, as opposed to horseback sports played by aristocracy.
Nothing to do with the fact that the ball is kicked, thrown or passed by hand.
#13856282
Otebo wrote:Is it possible for TIG to post in a thread without engaging in a bit of Brit bashing?

Plastic Paddies


Oh no! Don't call me names! That totally invalidates the provided neutral sources and citation for the correct English language terminology!
User avatar
By Beren
#13856296
Oxymoron wrote:If you want to talk about a real sport call it football.

Soccer is a real sport, so it seems it's proper to call it football. However, American football is not a sport, it's some sort of battle fought by modern gladiators. Gladiators are not sportsmen.
User avatar
By Bubba
#13856301
TIG must be trolling us. There are a shitload of football teams from the 19th century, as well as the 1900-1910 period, with the words "football club" (FC), or a translation of those words, in their name. Not only does everyone outside the United States use the word "football" (or a translation), instead of "soccer", their parents, grandparents and even great-grandparents did so too.

Case fucking closed.
Last edited by Bubba on 20 Dec 2011 22:08, edited 1 time in total.
#13856339
TIG must be trolling us. There are a shitload of football teams from the 19th century, as well as the 1900-1910 period, with the words "football club" (FC), or a translation of those words, in their name. Not only does everyone outside the United States use the word "football" (or a translation), instead of "soccer", their parents, grandparents and even great-grandparents did so too.

Case fucking closed.


As has been pointed out, football is the generic for a sport not played on horses, as has been alluded to several times.
User avatar
By Bubba
#13856341
The Immortal Goon wrote:As has been pointed out, football is the generic for a sport not played on horses, as has been alluded to several times.


Yes, that's why the world is teaming with baseball, volleybal and cricket teams with "FC" in their name...
#13856390
Bubba wrote:Yes, that's why the world is teaming with baseball, volleybal and cricket teams with "FC" in their name...


And yet the world is teaming with boxing, rugby, and lacrosse that and all are referred to as "contact sports."

Those are specific names for various types of football - if you want to get all technical about it. Soccer is also a type of football.

But if you want to get all technical about it, when the English invaded Ireland the Irish language supposed to be stamped out. By law, Peil has been referred to "football" instead of the Irish name for half a millennium before anybody was playing soccer. Thus, you stole the name "football" for another sport that you made up a new name for.

But that's not really what happened of course, the fact is that - as many have pointed out - football is a generic term in English. It's why every English speaking country has a different kind of "football."

Beyond that, if you need an Anglophile source:

TIFO wrote:For all you out there who love to complain when Americans, and certain others, call “Football”, “Soccer”, you should know that it was the British that invented the word and it was also one of the first names of what we now primarily know of as “Football”.

In fact, in the early days of the sport among the upper echelons of British society, the proper term for the sport was “Soccer”. Not only that, but the sport being referred to as “Soccer” preceded the first recorded instance of it being called by the singular word “Football” by about 18 years. This happening when it became more popular with the middle and lower class. When that happened, the term “Football” gradually began dominating over “Soccer” and the then official name “Association Football”.

In the 1860s, as in most of history with records as far back as 1004 B.C., there were quite a lot of “football” sports in existence being played popularly throughout the world and of course, England. Many of these sports had similar rules and eventually, on October 26th, 1863, a group of teams in England decided to get together and create a standard set of rules which would be used at all their matches. They formed the rules for “Association Football”, with the “Association” distinguishing it from the many other types of football sports in existence in England, such as “Rugby Football”.

Now British school boys of the day liked to nickname everything, which is still somewhat common. They also liked to add the ending “er” to these nicknames. Thus Rugby was, at that time, popularly called “Rugger”. Association Football was then much better known as “Assoccer”, which quickly just became “Soccer” and sometimes “Soccer Football”.

The inventor of the nickname is said to be Charles Wredford Brown, who was an Oxford student around the time of Association Football’s inception. Legend has it, in 1863 shortly after the creation of Association Football, Wredford-Brown had some friends who asked him if he’d come play a game of “Rugger”, to which he replied he preferred “Soccer”. The name caught on from there.
User avatar
By Swagman
#13856434
Cartertonian wrote:'Football' (either variant herein discussed) is a game played by overpaid, poncy prima donnas.

Real men play rugby.

:D


Particularly the League version...

And it was also debunked.

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

will putin´s closest buddy Gennady Timchenko be […]

https://youtu.be/URGhMw1u7MM?si=YzcCHXcH9e-US9mv […]

Xi Jinping: "vladimir, bend down even lower, […]