Oxymoron wrote:If he was such a homerun he would never have been allowed to leave Indiana.
This just shows you haven't been paying attention. Manning IS very much THAT good. The fact is, he left Indy due to a perfect storm situation, and that's the only reason he left. This isn't a normal situation where a QB like McNabb leaves after 10 years. Indy went 2-14 last year after being a perennial contender with Manning. He left now because they ended up with the number one pick in the draft (which they got because Manning WASNT playing) and probably the best QB prospect since HIM will be available with that pick. I don't blame Indy for a minute either. They have to take Luck. They'd be idiots not too. But you can't take Luck and then play Manning for the next 3-5 years. It'd just be stupid and would waste an awesome talent's early career.
Oxymoron wrote:He is a risk,
Nonsense.
Oxymoron wrote:he might be 80% manning that will be good,
He'll be 100%.
Oxymoron wrote:Why get rid of a stud Athlete who sells tickets, who wins games in favor of this guy whos own team let him go.
Manning is 1000 times better than Tebow and when he wins something big soon, he will sell as many, if not more tickets than Tebow ever could.
Oxymoron wrote:It is simply the ignorant not liking Tebow not being a perfect mold of a quarterback and finding an excuse to get rid of him.
I DO like him, remember? The fact is, he is a gimmick. I hope he works for a long time. I hope he wins 10 Super Bowls, but realistically, he isn't going too and not getting Manning in hopes Tebow can wave his magic wand for 10 years is just being completely irresponsible to your team.
"When do you ask yourself,
'Maybe everyone else isn't wrong for using the definitions of words; maybe I'm wrong for making up new definitions of words and then using them as crude slurs' -TiG