Raptor wrote:This is excellent. I hope the West's intolerance of Islam continues to rise.This is excellent. I hope the West's intolerance of Islam continues to rise.
You said it very bluntly, but I have to agree, we need to draw the line now.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Europe Mods
Raptor wrote:This is excellent. I hope the West's intolerance of Islam continues to rise.This is excellent. I hope the West's intolerance of Islam continues to rise.
How would you like the line drawn, Rei?
GandalfTheGrey wrote:clearly we need a return to the 'good ol days' when non-christians/non-whites knew their place.
politburo player wrote:We are lucky that the Hispanics who dominate the immigrant scene here in the U.S. are all a bunch of good hearted, hard working Catholics. I'll tell ya, if the mass of humanity coming across the U.S. Southern border was anything but good Catholic boys, the U.S. would have nothing to do with it!
If they were angry Muslims like in Europe, the U.S. would be the poster child for political un-correctness...
It is the Latino wave that will ultimately save the Catholic faith from utter domination by Islam in Europe.
NEW YORK: Apparently following in Switzerland’s footsteps, the New York City Department of Buildings has said that a proposed mosque with a four-story community center cannot have a minaret erected alongside. The ruling has left New York’s Muslim community frustrated and angered over what they have called “bigotry.”
Ramzy Ghazem, a 29-year-old American Muslim living in New York City, said the ruling is “another proof that America is not ready to understand and deal with Muslims in a tolerant matter.
“It is just a minaret, churches have steeples all over so why is a minaret a big deal?” he asked.
The Muslim mosque and community center’s building plans were submitted last July to the city, but were rejected after the zoning committee said no to the minaret. They were then resubmitted without the minaret and accepted.
Construction is under way at the moment, but the frustration, especially after Switzerland last fall banned all minarets from the country. American Muslims believed the United States would react differently.
“We thought our country would support us,” began Hussein, an Iranian-American who has lived his entire life in the states. “But, it looks like Americans still hold a grudge against its own citizens who are Muslims.”
Anti-minaret activists have distributed leaflets in the Brooklyn area urging people to say “no” to the proposal to erect the Islamic structure.
One of those individuals from the group Bay People said that “Islamic culture is not part of American society and we do not want to encourage hate,” showing the attitudes of many in the city.
The group has started an online petition against the mosque and minaret, and has already been signed by 300 residents. They accuse the mosque’s main sponsor the Muslim American Society (MSA) of “seeking to establish an Islamic state in America” and of being associated with organizations critical of Israel.
A recent Washington Post-ABC poll revealed that more than half of Americans hold negative views toward Islam.
Likewise, a Pew Research Center study discovered that American Muslims, which number around 7 million, are the most discriminated religious group in the country.
Mohamed Razvi, the founder and Executive Director of the Council of Peoples Organization (COPO), which according to their website, “is dedicated to building relations among diverse communities,” points the finger at the media for spreading misconceptions about the Muslim community
Razvi, a Brooklyn resident of Pakistani origin, believes Muslims should take a proactive approach to deal with the trend of fear about mosques in post 9/11 America.
http://bikyamasr.com/?p=9974
In some places in Sweden they are banned from flying the Swedish flag at schools.
It´s considered offensive to muslim students.
Religious traditions and books aren't like football teams: they don't exist to try to dominate one another. They are supposed to be philosophical positions that ANYONE can adopt.
When religions are gang-affiliations that try to dominate other groups, they stop being religions and become just a series of gang-related practices. Like secret handshakes among bloods or crips.
governmentcontract wrote:If Europe and the USA are so intolerant of Muslims, as you seem to be implying with your "pot calling the kettle black" comment, certainly you can provide us with many examples? Why are Muslims still applying to immigrate en masse to the USA and Europe from primarily Muslims countries? If the USA and Europe are so intolerant of Muslims, certainly Muslims would try to avoid these lands?
Thompson_NCL wrote:
The problem is that Islam is not very tolerant of others, generally wherever Islam exists there is conflict with non-Muslims. So the only way for the other religions to survive is to BECOME like footballs teams or gangs. In south east asia for example, the minority muslims in many countries are attacking the native religions. Are the minority jews doing the same in say, Iran? Or the coptic christians in Egypt?
So, Islam is the problem here I'd say. Or more precisley, a cross section of Muslims.
One doesn't need to assume anything, everyone unde[…]
I gave you a perfectly good definition actually, […]