- 14 Sep 2009 21:21
#13164052
So you think they should bend the rules to save the man and take the gay man's blood or no? Or should the man who needs the blood just die because there are no straight people and lesbians to donate blood?
Also, should blood banks test all samples of blood for deadly diseases like HIV/AIDS automatically?
DanDaMan wrote:[]DDM, imagine a person has a rare blood type. And there is a gay guy who has that same blood type the person needs, and the blood banks didn't have it. How do you suppose he gets blood?[]I think if it's rare the blood banks would of course warrant the expense. That's just common sense.
Just like it's common sense to exclude common blood form a group more likely to be rejected.
So you think they should bend the rules to save the man and take the gay man's blood or no? Or should the man who needs the blood just die because there are no straight people and lesbians to donate blood?
Also, should blood banks test all samples of blood for deadly diseases like HIV/AIDS automatically?