- 22 May 2009 16:45
#1914307
No no no, you misunderstand me.
What I said it that I like liberalism in the sense of being a system where people with different conceptions of what is desirable (like atheists, Jews, Christians, Stoics, Buddhists etc etc etc) may co-exist, rather than as a doctrine the way Objectivism is compared to other strains of libertarianism.
From what I understand, this is the point of the overlapping consensus.
Order wrote:So are you saying Rawls theory is one in which multiple theories of the good cannot co-exist?
No no no, you misunderstand me.
What I said it that I like liberalism in the sense of being a system where people with different conceptions of what is desirable (like atheists, Jews, Christians, Stoics, Buddhists etc etc etc) may co-exist, rather than as a doctrine the way Objectivism is compared to other strains of libertarianism.
From what I understand, this is the point of the overlapping consensus.