british india - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in India.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one-line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
By jiam17
#1263200
In the 19th century, Britian exploration lead to the establishment of British India.

The Indian population is much larger than British explorers. How can an entire group of people be subordinate to foreigners?
User avatar
By soron
#1263703
Divide & Conquer.

I understand the Brits supported the local rulers, provided they bowed to the British Vice King.
By Torwan
#1263801
Technological advantage equals numbers.

And the british empire was extremely far advanced compared to the backwater kingdoms of India.
User avatar
By Ter
#13655869
For most of those years, it was the British East India Company that was in charge. A company. Making profit. And very few British people there to control the teeming masses.
Nowadays people don't want to be ruled by other people. It is the communists that gave them those ideas.

Ter
User avatar
By Bosnjak
#13673684
The british invented the steam machine, an invention as much as important, the wheel was. Britain made the most important step after the begining of farming, the industrialisation.

Britain was simply some centuries advanced. This allone can not explain why the British won.

More important. India was ruled by Muslims, but the majority population was Hindu, this made it easy for the British to divide and conquer.


I think British India was better governed then the modern India.

Look at the hole Infrastructure built in this time, some steam trains built in this era still drive arround in India today.
User avatar
By Igor Antunov
#13701063
India was a hodge podge of various states before british companies moved in for the kill. The mughals had already collapsed.

And the british raj was very loose, various princelings and maharajas got to benefit from british protection just by signing a document and little else. It was a hands off protectorate. Being puppeted wasn't a big deal, they didn't have any way to project their own foreign policies anyway, these princely kingdoms were too small and weak.

The british tendrils spread over time, but once ghandi came and united the masses to a significant extent, the british stood no chance.

It was division that made india an easy target. As another example, China proved too difficult to fracture even by multiple powers despite it's crappy regime at the time, a regime which made foreign meddling possible. Once the weak and corrupted imperial regime fell the country was essentally freed from foreign molestation until the japanese tried their hand at it and got bogged down.

Point is india was just not india at the time of british conquest, it was many states. The british helped unite india.
World War II Day by Day

On paper, and to a great extent in practice too, […]

This is a story about a woman who was denied adequ[…]

Yes, it does. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M[…]

He may have gotten a lot more votes than Genocide[…]