Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Fasces wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x9v3awkuG0&ab_channel=ShepBostin
Saeko wrote:
You ever wonder why you don't hear about mysterious poisonings in the household anymore?
Saeko wrote:You ever wonder why you don't hear about mysterious poisonings in the household anymore?
Pants-of-dog wrote:As for the claim that divorce favours the woman due to child custody, this seems incorrect. Most divorce settlements try to maintain the child raising situation as much as possible. So, most of the time, women get custody because they are the ones who were doing most of the child parenting before the divorce. The only common exception is when one parent moves away at the time of the divorce, making it impossible to share custody.Statistics show that women win child custody rights a staggering 90% of the time, even though fathers play an important role in their children's lives pre and post-divorce.
Godstud wrote:Statistics show that women win child custody rights a staggering 90% of the time, even though fathers play an important role in their children's lives pre and post-divorce.
https://familylawattorneymesaaz.net/div ... %2Ddivorce.
You might feel that it's incorrect, but the reality shows otherwise. Sabotaging a man in family custody court is appallingly easy. A simple asking of a restraining order against a father cause calamity, whether that is justified, or not.
Father's parental rights groups exist now for a reason.
If women do the majority of the child-rearing before the divorce is irrelevant. Divorce should seek 50% custody of children from the start, unless circumstances dictate otherwise. Canada IS better than most, but still has problems due to an inherent bias(traditionalism).
Anyways, we're getting off topic. The thread isn't about custody of children, but divorce.
Godstud wrote: I am for making it a great deal more difficult to obtain, and make re-marrying, after a divorce, exceptionally hard.
Fasces wrote:And again, I think you need to solve issues like grooming, child marriages, and widespread domestic abuse before you go about trying to make 'divorce' more rigid. You're trying to fix the wrong issue first. Trapping people into marriages of abuse and punishing them for escaping seems to be having your priorities mixed up.FFS... You talk about exceptions. These do not make the rule. I took into account criminal behavior( I addressed it as an exception), but you seem to have ignored that. I did not talk about trapping people in abusive marriages. You are making a Strawman.
Pants-of-dog wrote:What should be done is what is best for the children.Having two parents(male/female) involved in raising a child is what is best for children. This is a statistical fact.
No. I can see certain physical phenotypes, which […]
OK, so it's good for Europe the US (oil companies[…]
God dammit, Rich. This is like whenever anyone b[…]
The cost-of-living crisis is so bleak that some G[…]