- 14 Jul 2013 04:43
#14271026
In my experience online sources of news copy the format of news found on TV, radio and in papers.
Why isn't the internet more interactive?
For example a headline could have 3 links posted beneath it. Each link would connect to articles of varying length. This way if a story is of mild interest you could read a 1000 word article but if you find the subject more engaging you could read a 10,000 word article.
You could also specify your interest in various categories- countries, political parties, ideology, technology, history, etc. Every time you read an article you could rate the level of interest it provoked in you and algorithms would direct relevant content towards you in the future. This would also allow the producer of news to focus resources in high demand areas in the future.
You should also be able to "subscribe" to a story in order to receive updates of future developments.
Why isn't the internet more interactive?
For example a headline could have 3 links posted beneath it. Each link would connect to articles of varying length. This way if a story is of mild interest you could read a 1000 word article but if you find the subject more engaging you could read a 10,000 word article.
You could also specify your interest in various categories- countries, political parties, ideology, technology, history, etc. Every time you read an article you could rate the level of interest it provoked in you and algorithms would direct relevant content towards you in the future. This would also allow the producer of news to focus resources in high demand areas in the future.
You should also be able to "subscribe" to a story in order to receive updates of future developments.
Pro life in the womb
Pro gun in the classroom
Pro gun in the classroom
- By Pants-of-dog
- By Puffer Fish
- By litwin