Thunderhawk wrote:Compared to the Germans fighters the Soviets had inferrior fighters. Maybe not a great deal inferrior, but combined with poor pilots and poor training it mounts up. I dont discount his success, but the context does diminish his success. Should American pilots during GW1&2 who shoot down out-dated dilapidated Iraqi craft be as highly praised as American pilots in WW2 who faced the (early to mid-war) Japanese?
If you read the bottom sections of the source I have provided, even if it is Wikipedia, there is a section on his tactics. Given his "stalk-and-ambush"
modus operandi, and his "point blank" firing, it does not matter what kind of plane you have, you would still go down. He claims that 80% of his enemies downed "didn't know what hit them". At point blank range in an ambush, a MG 15 autocannon, although weak, would have easily ripped through aircraft armour.
He was known to have poor equipment himself, as you say his enemies did. To compensate for that poor equipment and lack of fire power - although his Messerschmitt Bf 109 was powerful - by using the element of surprise and catching his enemies flat-footed. I understand where your suspicions come from, since the top three scoring aces in World War II were German pilots that fought on the Eastern Front.
"PR [and politics] is about theory, not practice. A philosopher may very well argue that a table doesn't exist in principle, but he can still have his dinner on one." ~ Charles Prentiss
E: +2.50
S: -5.28