- 12 Aug 2011 06:45
#13778816
THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIAN KRAYINA
THE GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT OF THE THE RSK IN EXILE
Zemun, 11080, 3 Magistratski trg, Serbia
Phone No. 3077-028, vladarsk@gmail.com
No. 1367/11 – August 10, 2011
TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Mr Boris Tadić
Belgrade 11000, 1 Andrićev venac
(The Government and Parliament of the RS Krayina in exile, along with this Letter, reproaches editorships of all media in the Republic of Serbia for not publishing, since February 2005, the statements regarding Krayina. This is a serious offence against national and state interests and violation of the journalistic Codex).
SUBJECT: The Essence of the Osimo Accords – the Crime of Genocide against the Serbs in Croatia in 1941-45 Period
Mr President,
We want to remind you of the dispute going on in regard to the ownership concerning the real estates of the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, in Istria, between the Government of Croatia and the Vatican (the Roman Catholic Church). The Government of Croatia holds that the real estates of this monastery belong to Croatia, for in the Osimo Accords (1975) between the Republic of Italy and the SFR Yugoslavia, it is specified that all real estates of the Italians banished between 1943 and 1945, become ownership of the state of Yugoslavia, and that Italy will repay the value of the mentioned real estates to the banished Italians – who lived in Italy and the third countries.
Contrary to the explanation of the Government of Croatia, the Vatican holds that the Osimo Accords have nothing to do with the properties of the Roman Catholic Church, and that their provisions cannot be applied to the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, so that the corporation from Croatia „Abacija (Abbazia) d.o.o“ from Praglia, cannot be in possession of the real estates of the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, the mentioned real estates being the ownership of the Roman Catholic Church.
Mr President,
Since the Republic of Serbia is a successor state of the SFR Yugoslavia, it is responsible for the Osimo Accords, about whose provisions it has to take the view, for these provisions regulate part of the compensation for the war damages – caused by the crimes of genocide committed against the Serbian, Roma and Jewish peoples in the Independent State of Croatia – whose successor states are the Republic of Croatia and Moslem-Croatian Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Naturally, the responsibilities for the crimes of genocide also rest on the countries which committed aggression and occupation of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia: Germany, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria and Albania. The responsibility of Germany and Italy is ispecially pronounced because they established the Independent State of Croatia and aproved its plan of the biological extermination of the Serba, Roma and Jews.
The phenomenon of the time after Worlde War II lies in the fact that Yugoslavia is the only victim of the fascists countries which has not been paid the war damages. Germany and Italy avoided it under the excuse that Yugoslavia did not request the payment of the war damages from Hungary, Bulgaria and Albania, absoling them because they were socialist countries. Germany and Italy also criticized Yugoslavia for not requesting the compensation from the Democratic Republic of Germany, which was a socialist country and a member state of the Treaty of Warsaw.
However, there was a formal Request for the payment of the war damages to the SFR Yugoslavia by Germany and Italy, but that Request was unpleasant to the Governments of Germany and Italy – especially in the 1970-1980 decade, when Yugoslavia and its President Josip Broz Tito were highly esteemed in the World. Due to the reputation of Yugoslavia, the Governments of Germany and Italy made decisions to pay some kind of the compenastion for the war damages, but it had to be reduced to a kind of the treaty between the states, in order to avoid mentioning World War II and horrendous crimes of the fascist states committed over the Serbs, Roma and Jews. Josip Broz Tito agreed to such a solution proposed by Italy and Germany, although it was just a small part of the compensation sum which was to be repaid to Yugoslavia. This is how bilateral treaties were made between Yugoslavia and Italy and Germany, respectively.
1 With Germany, on the Brioni Islands, in 1973. It was a meeting of the German Chancellor Willy Brandt and the President of Yugoslavia, Josip Broz Tito. They signed the „Brioni Formula“, which was top secret – it was not publicised, but it was ratified in the Federal Assembly of Yugoslavia on December 26, 1974. We only know that instead of the payment of the war damages, Germany gave Yugoslavia DM 700 million in the form of a credit, and at the same time Germany gave up the poperties of the Germans who returned from Yugoslavia to Germany (after two-hundred-year stay in the Serbian lands). Germans from Czech, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Poland (settled there by Germany and Austria because of their colonial interests) also returned to Germany. These DM 700 million were registered by the National Bank of Yugoslavia as a credit arrangement. According to the „Brioni Formula“, the Federal Executive Board was supposed to send a Decision on Nonreturn of that credit to the National Bank, but the Federal Executive Board, presided by Mr Veselin Đuranović, failed to do it, and the National Bank of Yugoslavia paid DM 700 million back to Germany, along with the corresponding interest. With that money the NE „Krško“, in Slovenia, was built up, and the money was given from the federal budget. (Based on this fact, the NE „Krško“ should have been the subject of the distribution (succession) among all the newly formed states in the territory of the former Yugoslavia).
2 With Italy, at Osimo near Ancona, on November 10, 1975. These accords were ratified ba both Parliaments on October 11 1977. Although they contain the provisions on good neighbourly relations, on the recognition of borders and the developing of the economic cooperation, the Provision on the Italian payment of the compensation for the real estates of Italians which remained in Croatia and Slovenia – when they were banished from these Republics during the last two years of the War and after it ended. Yugoslavia agreed not to be paid the war damages directly by Italy, but that it be solved so that Yugoslavia should not pay for the compensation of the private properties of the Italian families in Slovenia and Croatia. It is obvious that the Vatican is right in regard to the real estates of the Monastery of Daila, for the Government of Italy did not pay the Vatican the value of the church properties in Slovenia and Croatia. (Even according to this provision, the value of properties of the banished Italians in Slovenia and Croatia should have been the subject of didtributionh (succession) among all newly formed states from the territory of the former Yugoslavia, not to be, in the whole, the property of Slovenia and Croatia).
Mr President,
It is clear that the Osimo Accords are of top importance for all Serbian states (Serbia, the Republic of Srpska, Montenegro, and the Republic of Serbian Krayina), and that they are not a closed book, as was stated by the President of the Government of Croatia, Mrs Jadranka Ksor. It is of special importance that with the destruction of Yugoslavia there were formed two successor states of the Independent State of Croatia (the Republic of Croatia and Moslem-Croatian Federation) and that they (along with Germany, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Albania) owe an enormous sum for the compensation of the war damages for the crimes committed over the Serbs, Roma and Jews. For in the territory of the Independent State of Croatia there were committed the most horrendous crimes over these three peoples, and the number of the killed largely exceeeds one million. The crimes were committed by Croatia in concentracion death camps, and in all Serbian places – throwing people into caves, burning them in churches, houses, schools. . . There is no staute of limitation for the crime of genocide, and for the crimes committed during WW II responsibility rests on Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary, Albania, Croatia, and Moslem-Croatian Federation, and for the crime of genocide over the Serbs in the 1990-95 period, as well as for the occupation of the Republic of Serbian Krayina and the banishment of the Serbs that were leftover – the responsibility rests on the Republic of Croatia, with possible responsibility of of its allies: the Vatican, NATO, and EU.
Initiating the responsibilities for these crimes is your competence, and the competence of the chiefs of other Serbian states – the Republic of Srpska and Montenegro. We from the Government and Parliament of the Republic of Serbian Krayina in exile have propsed to you on many occasions.
Since your Cabinet rejects thze cooperation with the Government and Parliament of the Republic of Serbian Krayina in exile, this is an open Letter.
Milorad Buha, Prime Minister Eng. Rajko Ležaić, President of Parliament
THE GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT OF THE THE RSK IN EXILE
Zemun, 11080, 3 Magistratski trg, Serbia
Phone No. 3077-028, vladarsk@gmail.com
No. 1367/11 – August 10, 2011
TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Mr Boris Tadić
Belgrade 11000, 1 Andrićev venac
(The Government and Parliament of the RS Krayina in exile, along with this Letter, reproaches editorships of all media in the Republic of Serbia for not publishing, since February 2005, the statements regarding Krayina. This is a serious offence against national and state interests and violation of the journalistic Codex).
SUBJECT: The Essence of the Osimo Accords – the Crime of Genocide against the Serbs in Croatia in 1941-45 Period
Mr President,
We want to remind you of the dispute going on in regard to the ownership concerning the real estates of the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, in Istria, between the Government of Croatia and the Vatican (the Roman Catholic Church). The Government of Croatia holds that the real estates of this monastery belong to Croatia, for in the Osimo Accords (1975) between the Republic of Italy and the SFR Yugoslavia, it is specified that all real estates of the Italians banished between 1943 and 1945, become ownership of the state of Yugoslavia, and that Italy will repay the value of the mentioned real estates to the banished Italians – who lived in Italy and the third countries.
Contrary to the explanation of the Government of Croatia, the Vatican holds that the Osimo Accords have nothing to do with the properties of the Roman Catholic Church, and that their provisions cannot be applied to the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, so that the corporation from Croatia „Abacija (Abbazia) d.o.o“ from Praglia, cannot be in possession of the real estates of the Monastery of Daila near Poreč, the mentioned real estates being the ownership of the Roman Catholic Church.
Mr President,
Since the Republic of Serbia is a successor state of the SFR Yugoslavia, it is responsible for the Osimo Accords, about whose provisions it has to take the view, for these provisions regulate part of the compensation for the war damages – caused by the crimes of genocide committed against the Serbian, Roma and Jewish peoples in the Independent State of Croatia – whose successor states are the Republic of Croatia and Moslem-Croatian Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Naturally, the responsibilities for the crimes of genocide also rest on the countries which committed aggression and occupation of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia: Germany, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria and Albania. The responsibility of Germany and Italy is ispecially pronounced because they established the Independent State of Croatia and aproved its plan of the biological extermination of the Serba, Roma and Jews.
The phenomenon of the time after Worlde War II lies in the fact that Yugoslavia is the only victim of the fascists countries which has not been paid the war damages. Germany and Italy avoided it under the excuse that Yugoslavia did not request the payment of the war damages from Hungary, Bulgaria and Albania, absoling them because they were socialist countries. Germany and Italy also criticized Yugoslavia for not requesting the compensation from the Democratic Republic of Germany, which was a socialist country and a member state of the Treaty of Warsaw.
However, there was a formal Request for the payment of the war damages to the SFR Yugoslavia by Germany and Italy, but that Request was unpleasant to the Governments of Germany and Italy – especially in the 1970-1980 decade, when Yugoslavia and its President Josip Broz Tito were highly esteemed in the World. Due to the reputation of Yugoslavia, the Governments of Germany and Italy made decisions to pay some kind of the compenastion for the war damages, but it had to be reduced to a kind of the treaty between the states, in order to avoid mentioning World War II and horrendous crimes of the fascist states committed over the Serbs, Roma and Jews. Josip Broz Tito agreed to such a solution proposed by Italy and Germany, although it was just a small part of the compensation sum which was to be repaid to Yugoslavia. This is how bilateral treaties were made between Yugoslavia and Italy and Germany, respectively.
1 With Germany, on the Brioni Islands, in 1973. It was a meeting of the German Chancellor Willy Brandt and the President of Yugoslavia, Josip Broz Tito. They signed the „Brioni Formula“, which was top secret – it was not publicised, but it was ratified in the Federal Assembly of Yugoslavia on December 26, 1974. We only know that instead of the payment of the war damages, Germany gave Yugoslavia DM 700 million in the form of a credit, and at the same time Germany gave up the poperties of the Germans who returned from Yugoslavia to Germany (after two-hundred-year stay in the Serbian lands). Germans from Czech, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Poland (settled there by Germany and Austria because of their colonial interests) also returned to Germany. These DM 700 million were registered by the National Bank of Yugoslavia as a credit arrangement. According to the „Brioni Formula“, the Federal Executive Board was supposed to send a Decision on Nonreturn of that credit to the National Bank, but the Federal Executive Board, presided by Mr Veselin Đuranović, failed to do it, and the National Bank of Yugoslavia paid DM 700 million back to Germany, along with the corresponding interest. With that money the NE „Krško“, in Slovenia, was built up, and the money was given from the federal budget. (Based on this fact, the NE „Krško“ should have been the subject of the distribution (succession) among all the newly formed states in the territory of the former Yugoslavia).
2 With Italy, at Osimo near Ancona, on November 10, 1975. These accords were ratified ba both Parliaments on October 11 1977. Although they contain the provisions on good neighbourly relations, on the recognition of borders and the developing of the economic cooperation, the Provision on the Italian payment of the compensation for the real estates of Italians which remained in Croatia and Slovenia – when they were banished from these Republics during the last two years of the War and after it ended. Yugoslavia agreed not to be paid the war damages directly by Italy, but that it be solved so that Yugoslavia should not pay for the compensation of the private properties of the Italian families in Slovenia and Croatia. It is obvious that the Vatican is right in regard to the real estates of the Monastery of Daila, for the Government of Italy did not pay the Vatican the value of the church properties in Slovenia and Croatia. (Even according to this provision, the value of properties of the banished Italians in Slovenia and Croatia should have been the subject of didtributionh (succession) among all newly formed states from the territory of the former Yugoslavia, not to be, in the whole, the property of Slovenia and Croatia).
Mr President,
It is clear that the Osimo Accords are of top importance for all Serbian states (Serbia, the Republic of Srpska, Montenegro, and the Republic of Serbian Krayina), and that they are not a closed book, as was stated by the President of the Government of Croatia, Mrs Jadranka Ksor. It is of special importance that with the destruction of Yugoslavia there were formed two successor states of the Independent State of Croatia (the Republic of Croatia and Moslem-Croatian Federation) and that they (along with Germany, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Albania) owe an enormous sum for the compensation of the war damages for the crimes committed over the Serbs, Roma and Jews. For in the territory of the Independent State of Croatia there were committed the most horrendous crimes over these three peoples, and the number of the killed largely exceeeds one million. The crimes were committed by Croatia in concentracion death camps, and in all Serbian places – throwing people into caves, burning them in churches, houses, schools. . . There is no staute of limitation for the crime of genocide, and for the crimes committed during WW II responsibility rests on Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary, Albania, Croatia, and Moslem-Croatian Federation, and for the crime of genocide over the Serbs in the 1990-95 period, as well as for the occupation of the Republic of Serbian Krayina and the banishment of the Serbs that were leftover – the responsibility rests on the Republic of Croatia, with possible responsibility of of its allies: the Vatican, NATO, and EU.
Initiating the responsibilities for these crimes is your competence, and the competence of the chiefs of other Serbian states – the Republic of Srpska and Montenegro. We from the Government and Parliament of the Republic of Serbian Krayina in exile have propsed to you on many occasions.
Since your Cabinet rejects thze cooperation with the Government and Parliament of the Republic of Serbian Krayina in exile, this is an open Letter.
Milorad Buha, Prime Minister Eng. Rajko Ležaić, President of Parliament
REPUBLIC OF SERBIAN KRAJINA
- By JohnRawls
- By litwin