[hip hop bunny hop]

Watch how Mika Brzezinski lets them all roll on until about 8:10, which is when she draws all their POVs together. That's why "Morning Joe" works as a programme.

That's nice, but what about his work with Ali G?

[youtube]kwEd_tcKBfU[/youtube]

...funny shit. He was self-aware enough of the situation to get Sascha cracking up.

[Wolfman]

Buchanan wrote that it was impossible for 850,000 Jews to be killed by diesel exhaust fed into the gas chamber at Treblinka.

Which he didn't deny he said.

[Kman]

Which he didn't deny he said.

Remind me again why that is such a horrible thing to say, maybe he is right and they were killed by some other method?

[Andropov]

That's nice, but what about his work with Ali G?

[youtube]kwEd_tcKBfU[/youtube]

...funny shit. He was self-aware enough of the situation to get Sascha cracking up.

The man indeed lacks any sort of pretentiousness, which is rare in the modern day.

[Wolfman]

Remind me again why that is such a horrible thing to say, maybe he is right and they were killed by some other method?

It's called historic revisionism, and it's what Neo-Nazis do. And there is plenty of evidence that Buchanan is full of shit.

[Kman]

It's called historic revisionism, and it's what Neo-Nazis do. And there is plenty of evidence that Buchanan is full of shit.

So the word of mainstream historians is to be treated like gospel since if you question parts of it you are a Neo-Nazi?

[Wolfman]

No, because the only people who have disagreed on this case are people who are Nazis and Pat Buchanan.

[Kman]

No, because the only people who have disagreed on this case are people who are Nazis and Pat Buchanan.

You start your sentence with ''No'' and then you proceed to agree with what I wrote.

[Wolfman]

Only because you don't seem to understand how sentences are formed.

What you said is: so, x is true because if not x, y?

I said: no, because people who have said not x are y.

[Andropov]

And there is plenty of evidence that Buchanan is full of shit.

So, very often, are you. Are you thus as morally repugnant as Hitler?

[southernmissouri2007]

I respect Pat Buchanan.

[Emerald Ocean]

So? Many former NAZIs were courted because their perceived value in the post-war situation. These men cooperated with our government and were invaluable in (EDIT) the struggle against the (/EDIT) deadliest ideology known to man, Communism. We shouldn't let the emotions of our Jewish minority override our national security concerns, now should we?

People spend so much time playing Don Quixote, fighting imaginary Nazis, that they fail to recognize how the west has been taken over by Karl Marx.


Buchanan warned us around 20 years ago that powerful Neocon Jews were in the process of co-opting the Republican party. There is no other way to describe the Kristol/Podhoertz movement other than "highly parasitic in nature", because the host still doesn't realize it is being attacked.

Neocons were the Trojan Horse to the Republican Party and conservatism in general.





.

[Rei Murasame]

Buchanan warned us around 20 years ago that powerful Neocon Jews were in the process of co-opting the Republican party. There is no other way to describe the Kristol/Podhoertz movement other than "highly parasitic in nature", because the host still doesn't realize it is being attacked.

I've heard that same thing being pointed out by Steve Sailer as well, and they may well be right.

I've had a few run-ins with the Neoconservative Jews, they seem to be pretty cynical about what they've done, they are just blatantly trying to tilt foreign policy in the direction that serves their other home country while simultaneously declaring that form of politics to be off-limits to any other group of people.

Is Buchanan still around, or did they bring him down?

[hip hop bunny hop]

He got fired from MSNBC, but he's still a syndicated columnist. What compounds the aggravation of this firing, for me, is that they fired a man who has served in several Presidential administrations & is perhaps the best known conservative populist in the nation, in a period where conservative populism is on a major upswing in what is likely to be a very contentious presidential campaign. The TV coverage of this cycle will be all the worst for it.

[Rei Murasame]

I agree, I used to really like hearing him, he really had a way with words. I've just taken a look around to see if he's made any comments on this, and there's this video:

Pat Buchanan on why MSNBC fired him
[youtube]O-Vfuj1sYpw[/youtube] [youtube]M8ksrG08VUg[/youtube]

He explains here to Sean Hannity (an odd thing that he appeared on Hannity's show, since they disagree on a lot of things), that during the 1970s and 1980s, his social views were seen as pretty standard-issue centre-right views. Since then he says that he 'has not changed at all', but since then certain political groups have come to hate and despise his views because they are afraid that his views might sway people over now.

[Emerald Ocean]

I've heard that same thing being pointed out by Steve Sailer as well, and they may well be right.

I've had a few run-ins with the Neoconservative Jews, they seem to be pretty cynical about what they've done, they are just blatantly trying to tilt foreign policy in the direction that serves their other home country while simultaneously declaring that form of politics to be off-limits to any other group of people.

You catch on quick...

Is Buchanan still around, or did they bring him down?

He was brought down in the mid-1990s after he began to expose what was happening to the Republican party in about 1990. Apparently when agents of Israel attempt to subvert the government of a sovereign nation you become an "anti-Semite" if you call them out.



The Neo-cons were actively infiltrating "conservative" establishments all throughout the Reagan era. Hence the upsurge in Mideast meddling in the 1980s (Beirut, Iran-Iraq war, etc.). Yet they did not have an ultimate toehold on the party until the late 1990s, when paleoconservative voices like Buchanan were drowned out by the sheer number of immaculately funded Neo-con think tanks and pressure groups like the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute and the Project for a New American Century.

Of course their knee jerk motto is "invade the world, invite the world", a tribute to their uber-globalist and suicidal stance on wars, immigration and free trade.

Neocons are the Trojan Horses of America, more so than illigitimate socialist Barry Soetero, IMO.

[hip hop bunny hop]

Hey Rei, does this quote seem accurate to you?

British Jews differ in some important ways from their American co-religionists. Most notably, they are less hostile to Christianity—as they can afford to be, there being very little ardent Christianity in Britain. They are consequently less prickly—less hostile to white gentiles in general. Furthermore they—most commonly, their great-grandparents—came into Britain when it was monoracial and monocultural. There was no ethnic or racial Other to excite them into sympathetic alienation by reminding them of their own ancient subjections, as blacks did in the USA. The upshot is that British Jews are better assimilated, better liked, less defensive, and more at ease in their nation than are American Jews. (For insights into Anglo-Jewish life I recommend the quietly funny novels and essays of Chaim Bermant.)
link

[youtube]9yQbIUKAd4Q[/youtube]

Around 18:15 he begins talking about when he went 3rd Party.

[Murph]

Pat Buchanan is right on just about everything. Love the guy, great sense of humor. Oh how things would have changed if was elected prez back in the 90's. There's still hope that some other patriot will lead us out of the dark ages.

In the mean time, hopefully Pat gets picked up by FOX.