- 11 Jan 2009 04:11
#1755647
I never much agreed with sports; being that, they are just physical competitions that, for the most part, either represents a person's commitment to physical improvements (football, basketball, soccer) or playing games (golf.) They are simply competitively unproductive pastimes. That said, seeking 'gender' equality would be a meaningless gesture. It does not escalate women into productive parts of society and has the negative potential of discouraging women from tending to more productive activities, like school work. In that sense, as an ex-feminist, I say that gender equality in sports is useless; still, like Abood, I see no reason to bar an especially athletic woman from sports play with men (I hear that quite a few women can dunk and whoop men at basketball.) If the sports were unified, though, I doubt that women would run track in the Olympics. That is an issue all itself, but I'd support gender unification for sports except that, in thinking about it, I realize that young girls would likely never pursue gymnastics if the sport were predominately field by men--but, thinking about it, I have no idea why the only sport that I specifically defend is the one with thirteen-year-old women in tights . . ..
*is hungry for Chinese.*