- 21 Jan 2009 01:59
#1767184
I was using a metaphor, I don't think any Israeli diplomat would wish to sit down at the same table as a Hamas diplomat, let alone sign an agreement with one - doing so would damage their political career with recriminations from right wing zionists that they deal with terrorists. But you can't escape the fact that Hamas offered a ceasefire on the principle of: Open the border crossings and the rocket fire will cease.
Thus Israel stuffed around with opening and closing the border crossings, thus the rockets kept flying.
The block-aid of Gaza has been going on for longer than that. Israel's strangle hold only became tighter after Hamas won the election. In actual terms of control, Israel has been in change of Gaza's borders since it captured the territory! Just because there are no troops inside the area, does not mean Israel does not control it when Israel controls the land, air, and sea borders of Gaza.
Think of Gaza like a cardboard box, with Israel being the guy in charge of opening or closing the box to put things into it, or to take things out of it. Thus the guy controls the box, even though he is not inside the box.
Why should the Palestinians be restricted in who they can or can not trade with, when Israel is not? Thats a double standard - and you wonder why they are fighting you?
In difference to you, I don't like anyone getting killed in this conflict, Palestinian or Israeli. But I am not so naive as to get swept along in the rhetoric! I look deeper to see why people are fighting, why people are getting killed, etc. So if you get killed in the next war, i'll be sad, even for you. But I'll be damn annoyed about the fools errand your being sent on in the first place.
You can weep for the 10, I'll weep for the 1010+ dead.
And how are you going to do that? By bombing them? By restricting their trade? By starving them?
What reason, other than the already violent or collective punishment reasons will you employ in order to make them not want to fight? What carrot will you dangle before them that will make them want to live for peace, rather than die for freedom?
Oh you most certainly do, but I am resisting the urge to call you Seamen Stains.
"Netanyahu is like a man who, while negotiating the division of a pizza, continues to eat it." - Avi Shlaim, British-Israeli historian.
Seamen wrote:And you say I'm a funny fellow.
I was using a metaphor, I don't think any Israeli diplomat would wish to sit down at the same table as a Hamas diplomat, let alone sign an agreement with one - doing so would damage their political career with recriminations from right wing zionists that they deal with terrorists. But you can't escape the fact that Hamas offered a ceasefire on the principle of: Open the border crossings and the rocket fire will cease.
Thus Israel stuffed around with opening and closing the border crossings, thus the rockets kept flying.
Seamen wrote:That was after the started shooting rockets.
The block-aid of Gaza has been going on for longer than that. Israel's strangle hold only became tighter after Hamas won the election. In actual terms of control, Israel has been in change of Gaza's borders since it captured the territory! Just because there are no troops inside the area, does not mean Israel does not control it when Israel controls the land, air, and sea borders of Gaza.
Think of Gaza like a cardboard box, with Israel being the guy in charge of opening or closing the box to put things into it, or to take things out of it. Thus the guy controls the box, even though he is not inside the box.
Seamen wrote:Anyway, you seem to say "Israel should let the Palestinians trade whatever they want with whoever they wont". Hell no, 10 dead soldiers is bad enough, and I give up the chace to rise this number, specially considering the fact that I will be fighting the next war.
Why should the Palestinians be restricted in who they can or can not trade with, when Israel is not? Thats a double standard - and you wonder why they are fighting you?
In difference to you, I don't like anyone getting killed in this conflict, Palestinian or Israeli. But I am not so naive as to get swept along in the rhetoric! I look deeper to see why people are fighting, why people are getting killed, etc. So if you get killed in the next war, i'll be sad, even for you. But I'll be damn annoyed about the fools errand your being sent on in the first place.
You can weep for the 10, I'll weep for the 1010+ dead.
Seamen wrote:Which means they already fight to death.
In that case I would rather give them a reason not to fight at all
And how are you going to do that? By bombing them? By restricting their trade? By starving them?
What reason, other than the already violent or collective punishment reasons will you employ in order to make them not want to fight? What carrot will you dangle before them that will make them want to live for peace, rather than die for freedom?
Seamen wrote:I am glad that I amuse you.
Oh you most certainly do, but I am resisting the urge to call you Seamen Stains.
"Netanyahu is like a man who, while negotiating the division of a pizza, continues to eat it." - Avi Shlaim, British-Israeli historian.