- 08 Jan 2014 19:43
#14350409
But anyway at an international level there is no government. The First and Second World war can just be thought of as vigorous competition between private security agencies. If an absolutist monarchy, is legitimate, and according to Libertarians everyone's an absolutist monarch on their own land, why can't democratic states be legitimate.
Rothbardian wrote:Proponents of statism feel they have a right to impose their opinions on others,Proponents of a particular system of property, feel they have a right to impose their opinions on others. What's the difference between an absolutist monarch and a libertarian landowner. The monarch of Monaco or Luxembourg govern less land than some land owners accepted as legitimate Capitalists by Libertarians.
But anyway at an international level there is no government. The First and Second World war can just be thought of as vigorous competition between private security agencies. If an absolutist monarchy, is legitimate, and according to Libertarians everyone's an absolutist monarch on their own land, why can't democratic states be legitimate.
Progressives lie scattered on Woke's highway, Diverse ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind.