Proposition regarding problematic parties - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
Forum rules: This is a the archive of the "PoFo Parliament". A user-run project.
User avatar
By R_G
#1865733
I'm sure as time passes if this idea is still held strong more order will be had.
User avatar
By Vladimir
#1865824
Press conference with the SN:

- "I must reject the slanderous class lies of that bourgeois clique "Unity Coalition". The SN has no anti-democratic clauses in our platform, and there is absolutely no legal base to stop our party from parliamentary participation. In fact, the very proposition made by the "Unity Coalition" is what is really undemocratic, as it calls for an illegal ousting of a party with popular workers' support, a fully democratic platform with no intention of disbanding or exploiting the parliamentary system. Such ridiculous slander is a clear example of bourgeois lies, false rhetoric and class war of bourgeois cliques against the working population. “Unity Coalition” will be judged by history as a rotten relic of bourgeois deception in an age of proletarian enlightenment. Such attacks upon the bourgeois parliamentary process by the bourgeoise itself only shows how bankrupt their positions are, and how much the SN is needed in the parliament to stir that rotting swamp into life”
User avatar
By Attica
#1866328
Attica, SLD candidate for Pofo Parliament said in a Press Conference, Saturday, "I am opposed to this proposition attempting to ban a number of parties from PoFo Parliament. A healthy democracy thrives on the freedom of both speech and association of its citizens. As long as these parties conform to the constitution of PoliticsForum.org, they should be allowed to continue to participate in PoFo Parliament."
User avatar
By Nets
#1866331
Vlad:

(a) Donald did not write this representing the PUC. This was his own initiative.
(b) Think you could use "bourgeois" any more in your post? Could you? :lol:
User avatar
By Attica
#1866333
This is a mock prop anyway as we haven't formed Parliament. But Politicians do this stuff all the time "We should do this do that" so at least it's good practice before real voting on issues once Parliament is formed :)
User avatar
By Vladimir
#1866715
Nets
(a) Donald did not write this representing the PUC. This was his own initiative.

In this case the SN demands the expulsion of Donald from PUC on the grounds of illegal demands.

(b) Think you could use "bourgeois" any more in your post? Could you?

:lol: nope.

You can open the tweet yourself.

According to OCHA, imports of both food and medici[…]

Women have in professional Basketball 5-6 times m[…]

@FiveofSwords still has not clarified what it […]