Politics Forum.org | PoFo

You guys have to be shitting me.

I'd like for you to rub a mixture of our fecal matter between my toes and massage them well. After that, I'd like a handjob.

You'll be quiet about this, and I might consider having your party registered.

and I might consider having your party registered.

Communism.

MB wrote:Bump because fuck the communists

I hereby pledge to be a loyal member of the Marijuana Party of PoFo.

**salutes portrait of Bob Marley while grasping a package of extra-large banana cream pie rolling papers**

Hell yes

Marijuana party Hoooraah

Hash Bola bOla



[youtube]BHe9qCBuGEY[/youtube]

party of god is not this party lol

party of god is not this party lol

MB, you are personifying God by saying this.

And the "person" you are creating is a boring and narrow-minded one.

Fall to your knees and take another hit from the repentance bong, mortal.

Yo dawg my dealer won't be around until 5pm don't you *(&(^&@# hate that?

^^^ Our first "issue."

Indeed. Clearly legalization is required.

EDIT: a potentially more important issue is the genocide Ingliz has planned for everyone who dared to question the legitimacy of his regime by voting for this 'illegal' party.

If you allow some input from a "fellow traveller" if you will:
I think until the election is over you should stay the "Marijuana Party", with exactly that, the promise of legalising marijuana without espousing any explicit other ideology (be it capitalism, socialism or whatever). I think right now the MP is needed to represent every single one of PoFo's population that is discontent with the way things are going right now.
I don't think that it would be wise to tear this apart by adopting any ideological stance. You also might want to consider proposing a united opposition front to the few people who voted PNL or CA.
I think the only way to effectively topple ingliz's regime is uniting, we should stand together against his dictatorship.

Okonkwo wrote:I don't think that it would be wise to tear this apart by adopting any ideological stance

I agree completely.

I think the only way to effectively topple ingliz's regime is uniting, we should stand together against his dictatorship.

Right on. This communist dictatorship must end. Some party has to do it.

You also might want to consider proposing a united opposition front to the few people who voted PNL or CA.

It would entirely be at the discretion of the members you speak of, I won't be coercing anyone into anything.

One thing I would like to do is hire an ROP artist to make a banner or signature image for the Marijuana Party.

The Marijuana Party is opposed to ideology, and will never adopt a hierarchy model of administration or responsibility. It strives for egalitarianism and widespread democratic input in decision-making when these decisions impact the Marijuana Commons.

Likewise, decisions are made according to specific issues in public hearings. Things like precedent and consistency will not be allowed to overrule the desires of the Marijuana Commons.

I say not only legalize it but make it mandatory.

The commons must come to the party, for the commons create the party (they are the party). The relationship is only inverted by those seeking to limit the totality of otherwise unfettered internet democracy.

oxy wrote:I say not only legalize it but make it mandatory.

really? Does oxymoron smoke the bud everyday?

really? Does oxymoron smoke the bud everyday?

No but if it was mandatory....

You may be onto something there. I suppose chronic could be distributed for use if voters were demanding.

I say we put in a few million in buying marijuana from local Mexicans, then distributing it among the people, as long as they pay for it. We're not Communists of course.

The commons must come to the party, for the commons create the party (they are the party). The relationship is only inverted by those seeking to limit the totality of otherwise unfettered internet democracy.

Obviously, the Marijuana Commons must become The Marijuana Party, if it is to make a positive change in the Marijuana Commons.

Theoretically, we are all members of the Marijuana Commons, even if we've never smoked a spliff in our lives.