- 31 Mar 2010 18:40
#13358892
Any attack against the jurisdiction of the Monarch would move them to the Left of the position of the Monarchy, Dan...
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
DanDaMan wrote:Err...No.
Phillip Blond, also not a Liberal wrote:"Similarly, public private schools could be established. Let concerned parents draw down public funds to run schools that avoid institutional failure by meeting their children's actual vocational and academic needs. If communities are to be engaged, they must be supported as autonomous self-governing entities in a mutual compact with state and society.
Furthermore, Cameron is a fan of the cooperative and guild movement - which should impel him towards supporting local economies so that small businesses can link together and successfully compete to ensure a wider diversity of supply, ownership and innovation. Indeed, he has already spoken of creating an advantageous tax and regulatory regime to tip the balance back in favour of the local retailer.
But conservatism must confront its greatest historic failing: the poor. A way out is the distinction between markets and capitalism; while the latter tends to a zero sum monopoly, the former need not. Indeed, a properly constituted market avoids monopoly capitalism and benefits all participants by eschewing the idea of a dispossessed class and extending ownership and the ability to trade to all. Real conservatism is therefore synonymous with fair trade, a just price and as wide as possible a distribution of assets, equity and credit."
DanDaMan wrote:Now you are doing what I hate... splitting intent and declaring both tyrants unequal because one uses acid on his people and the other uses boiling water.
DanDaMan wrote:Far right for me is anarchy.
Removal of a king to something less powerful is a move closer to that anarchy and Libertarianism.
DanDaMan wrote:Err...No.
Had they tried to dethrone the king and become the new king(s) they would have been left of the current king.
Err...No.
Had they tried to dethrone the king and become the new king(s) they would have been left of the current king.
That's basically what they did. They dethroned the king and then seized power for themselves.True, but on a much more limited basis. This means they moved closer to anarchy and therefore further Right.
DanDaMan wrote:Far right for me is anarchy.
DanDaMan wrote:This means they moved closer to anarchy and therefore further Right.
Political logic according to DanDaMan:Left is the opposite of Right, right?
Postulates:
Libertarianism is good.
The right-wing is good.
Totalitarianism is bad.
The left-wing is bad.
Conclusion:
Libertarianism is right-wing, and totalitarianism is left-wing.
Applying DanDaMan's 'logic' to other subjects yields some interesting results. For example:
Postulates:
A horse is an animal.
A snail is an animal.
A daffodil is a plant.
An oak tree is a plant.
Conclusion:
A horse is a snail and a daffodil is an oak tree.
Hmmm....
DanDaMan wrote:Left is the opposite of Right, right?
Ombrageux wrote:FFS DDM.
Stop spamming the forum with your junk! If you love your liberty so much, do what the slaves did and flee to that great bright beacon of liberty in North: O, Canada.
Then explain to me how a Libertarian is a Nazi?
Your scale makes no sense.
To you two totalitarians are the opposite of each other. How the hell does that make sense?
Clearly totalitarians are all from the same mold.
Libertarians are socially liberal, opposing government, like anarcho-communists. Capitalists and Fascists both support the existing class system, and so do the libertarians.Capitalists do not support fascism because fascism removes freedom to do business. Corporatist's do.
Likewise, it's strange to paint me at the extreme right when I advocate the abolition of private property, and the abolition of the state (roughly simaltaneously).That sounds like true anarchy to me and therefore the extreme right.
DanDaMan wrote:That sounds like true anarchy to me and therefore the extreme right.
Northern-Anarchist-X wrote:Historically Left was considered opposition to the government, while Right was conservative or support for the establishment.
Rei Murasame wrote:David Cameron. Not Liberal.
...You tell me your opinion on why that is happen[…]
You aren't American, you don't get a vote in my go[…]