- 13 Dec 2012 13:04
#14128774
In a sense.
Globalism is of course a factor. Speaking as one of the most prominent figures in the Benghazi-based National Transitional Council, Mustafa Abdul Jalil stated that what was occurring in Libya (the alleged "uprising" and the NATO campaign of unrestrained terrorism which followed) was a "natural part of the globalization process". As you see, sometimes even the best deceivers of men amongst them drop their masks in ultimate moments of self-revealing arrogance. They believe virtually no one will grasp the implications of a statement such as that, for example, and indeed for the overwhelming majority who even heard it, is is nothing more than so much political conjecture.
There is a reason the Syrian Arab Army is currently heroically resisting essentially the proxy army of the most pervasive forces of globalism around today - They understand the alternative to be servitude to outside powers for an indeterminate period of time and the financial puppetization of their state, which is effectively the threshold of the abyss. They understand that after Libya gained "freedom", Islamists now prowl the streets in Tripoli and blow up Sufi mosques in broad daylight, U.S. drones buzz above the airspace of their country with impunity, actual patriotic people are tied up in chains and forced to eat the former national flag while their daughters are raped and brutalized, and entire resistant towns are bombarded with heavy artillery and chemical weapons while the elite-collaborationist class organizes conferences in London to promote Western tourism to the Libyan Mediterranean coast.
This is the actual face of liberalism, Layman, and yes, it is vile and horrendous. In the United Kingdom where it has been cemented for two centuries plus it takes the form of having cretins such as William Hague and a national government that allows your own people to become a minority; a government that promotes the prosecution of women who state racist remarks on trains and have their children seized, but allows Pakistani rape gangs a slap on the wrist and foreign women who beat up an English girl and put her in the hospital in a clear case of attempted murder walk scot free as they "were not used to drinking alcohol in the Islamic culture".
In nations that become modern victims of neocolonialism and the system Britain is already firmly entrenched in, such as Libya, it takes the form of militias who ethnically cleanse an entire town writing on the walls "the brigade for purging slaves and black skin", who tie national soldiers upside down and beat their heads before beheading them with a sword, and who cut out the hearts of captives and trample them (as happened in Misrata). All the while the government resisting this terrorist scourge is blasted via international media which is monopolized by Western interests as "killing its own people".
I'd encourage a free-thinking young person such as yourself, Layman, to not become equally fooled over Syria, as I assure you the same level of terrorist atrocities on an outrageous scale is occurring. Syria is one of the last states, next to Iran and North Korea, I believe, that has not instituted a central bank that is directly controlled by Western finance and advised by the International Monetary Fund. Libya was also such a state. What was one of the first orders of business of the helpless "rebels" on the third or fourth day of their "revolution", before even controlling one town or city in its entirety? Declaring a new central bank and a new "Libyan National Oil Company". You do the math.
[youtube]OtGYTb41TZg[/youtube]
"I am never guided by a possible assessment of my work" - President Vladimir Putin
"Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin." - Muammar Qaddafi