- 03 Jun 2014 19:31
#14416643
Thank you for agreeing.
It must also be nice to not have to pay attention to the discussion and the exact nature of your claims.
Because you are essentially blaming a race of people for their own oppression by claiming they are too lazy/drunk/(whatever other insulting generalisation you want) to be treated decently , rather than look at history.
They lost what? And when? Some mythical war?
Please note that no one (including you) ever claims that the Germans deserve to have the same treatment as Aborigines.
If you don't say racist things, I won't call them out as racist.
We have already established that is contrary to Australian law and Australian ideals.
http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf ... ingsV1.pdf
The PDF is a study of Australian attitudes towards racism.
85.6% of Australians agree that "Something should be done to minimise or fight racism in Australia".
Like I said, it's not off topic for me.
I have shown that my claims and points are more relevant to the topic. You have not. I have no idea how some unlikely future HFL (yet multicultural) Australia is more relevant to modern Australia than modern Australia is.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Fasces wrote:Yes - through parallel Australian laws, aka the goodwill of Australian legal institutions.
Thank you for agreeing.
I'm not going to prove a claim I did not make. Don't put words in my mouth, and we won't have an issue.
It must also be nice to not have to pay attention to the discussion and the exact nature of your claims.
Where does racism enter into it?
Because you are essentially blaming a race of people for their own oppression by claiming they are too lazy/drunk/(whatever other insulting generalisation you want) to be treated decently , rather than look at history.
I never said they were too lazy or drunk - though interesting your mind immediately went there. I said they lost. There are lots of reasons they lost, but I sincerely doubt the fact that they're black has a thing to do with it. And losers deserve to be treated like losers, whether they're German, Zulu, or Manchu.
They lost what? And when? Some mythical war?
Please note that no one (including you) ever claims that the Germans deserve to have the same treatment as Aborigines.
Why are you so hellbent on using debate terminators like "racism" anyway? Would the fact that I were a racist change the merit of my words? Hitler was a racist and a vegetarian. Does that say anything about vegetarianism?
If you don't say racist things, I won't call them out as racist.
You have provided no evidence that it is contrary to Australian attitudes.
We have already established that is contrary to Australian law and Australian ideals.
http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf ... ingsV1.pdf
The PDF is a study of Australian attitudes towards racism.
85.6% of Australians agree that "Something should be done to minimise or fight racism in Australia".
Regardless of whether it is or isn't, it's off topic. I'm not discussing that and I have no idea why you keep bringing up such a pointless tangent.
Like I said, it's not off topic for me.
My point is relevant to the topic. If you don't want to discuss my point, stop pressing the "Reply" button.
I have shown that my claims and points are more relevant to the topic. You have not. I have no idea how some unlikely future HFL (yet multicultural) Australia is more relevant to modern Australia than modern Australia is.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...