- 02 Sep 2015 16:44
#14595809
Sure: an acre that is far from the desirable services and infrastructure government provides and the desirable opportunities and amenities communities provide, and that is not even particularly well endowed with the desirable physical qualities nature provides... AND IT STILL COSTS 5000 QUID FOR WHAT NATURE PROVIDED FREE OF CHARGE. The greedy, evil, thieving parasite who owns that acre of land is charging someone else 5K for what government, the community and nature provide, while contributing nothing whatever in return.
The value of land is the market's estimate of how much the owner will be able to steal from producers, consumers and taxpayers. In most places that is not very much. Similarly, in most places in the world, having a legal privilege of pocketing the locals' wages would not be worth very much.
So, I'm just trying to work out how the low value of being privileged to steal from the community in most parts of the world somehow makes it OK for rich, greedy, privileged parasites to steal trillions from the community in wealthier parts of the world. Can you help me out with that part of your "logic"?
I don't like privilege, injustice and evil, or the stupid lies that are always told to rationalize and justify them.
I assume you are aware that the exact same "logic" was used to justify chattel slavery:
"You should buy some slaves, in the US they are as cheap as chips, then you will see that all your frothy ideologising is pure bunkum."
I'm always interested in land-related scams, and gaining freehold title to land is always a scam.
I'm waiting....
taxizen wrote:TtP - Do you know that even in the uk one of the most densely populated and most desirable places to camp in the world, a place that is also at the peak of a decades long real estate asset bubble, you can buy an acre of land for just 5000 quid (that's about 7500 of your dollars)?
Sure: an acre that is far from the desirable services and infrastructure government provides and the desirable opportunities and amenities communities provide, and that is not even particularly well endowed with the desirable physical qualities nature provides... AND IT STILL COSTS 5000 QUID FOR WHAT NATURE PROVIDED FREE OF CHARGE. The greedy, evil, thieving parasite who owns that acre of land is charging someone else 5K for what government, the community and nature provide, while contributing nothing whatever in return.
You can buy a pretty decent car for 5000. Anywhere else in the world you can buy land for pocket money.
The value of land is the market's estimate of how much the owner will be able to steal from producers, consumers and taxpayers. In most places that is not very much. Similarly, in most places in the world, having a legal privilege of pocketing the locals' wages would not be worth very much.
So, I'm just trying to work out how the low value of being privileged to steal from the community in most parts of the world somehow makes it OK for rich, greedy, privileged parasites to steal trillions from the community in wealthier parts of the world. Can you help me out with that part of your "logic"?
So what is your problem?
I don't like privilege, injustice and evil, or the stupid lies that are always told to rationalize and justify them.
You should buy some land, in the US it is as cheap as chips, then you will see that all your frothy ideologising is pure bunkum.
I assume you are aware that the exact same "logic" was used to justify chattel slavery:
"You should buy some slaves, in the US they are as cheap as chips, then you will see that all your frothy ideologising is pure bunkum."
Hell I could tell you a way to gain freehold title to land without paying a penny to anyone. You interested?
I'm always interested in land-related scams, and gaining freehold title to land is always a scam.
taxizen wrote: Hell I could tell you a way to gain freehold title to land without paying a penny to anyone. You interested?
I'm waiting....
Last edited by Cartertonian on 26 Nov 2015 14:27, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: !