No. You have speculated that there are.
Sure, i mean i must have speculated about infinite regression in the past several 100s of years.
After all, 'm like 2 thousand years old so its not much since i created the rule.
And now you are contradicting your own posts.
"science cant explain what happened before the big bang. it also cant explain how the big bang happened."
Your exact words. I'm sure there are more but I can't be arsed trawling through the whole thread again.
I don't see how does this form a contradiction ? or where is the contradiction you're talking about ?
Through science we can trace back the big bang, until we reached the singularity.
Science indeed can not explain why the big bang happened, nor are we so far able to explain or figure out the abouts of the singularity. However we do know that the big bang happened and we do know its a singularity.
But laws of physics breaks down once you go back far enough to near the begining.
Which kinda is the point and i am not sure why all these pages and you haven't yet seen that this is my point. Science and generally how the universe works simply breaks down when you go back to a certain time. In short, when the universe came to be. Before that, was literally before the universe. Thus it simply external to it because it predates it.
But let me remind you of a few things that go towards debunking your supernatural god.
Anther thing you keep going on ignoring the very simple fact that the existence of god is study of philosophy and the study of god hemself is theology. two very different things when you get into the details.
If your god existed and was omnipotent he could prevent tens of thousands a day, every day, deaths from starvation.
He could have prevented the Japanese tsunami that resulted in 20,000 fatalities.
Likewise, the Great Plague in London that resulted in about 100,000 deaths..........
The list is endless.
And just as i said earlier. Why would he stop anything from happening ?
In matter of starvation, and wars and etc, i assure you there are more than enough resources and space for all of humanity to live an amazing and happy and fullfilling life.
How its distributed is on our hands and our responsibility.
For natural disasters. Sure, they're bad, but in one hand, everything has a purpose whether we know it or not. and on the other hand, why is it called a test if god is simply going to give us everything and stop everything.
Then there is the "intelligent" designer claim. The simple fact that over 99% of the species he designed have failed.
How did they fail ? all previous species are part of a greater system (i.e earth's eco system).
Each species have played a role in the system. If all have kept on living, and nothing ever went extinct or shrunk in population.
Earth would be entirely different. each era has played a role in the development of earth as whole. And each mass extinction event has opened the way for a new era of formation to begin.
If any stage didn't happen, we wouldn't survive at all. So why is this a failure ?
Not to mention the "logic" you keep on about.
Well, the debate about these principles has been going for 100s of years so far.
And people like your self have been trying to argue against it all this time and yet until now none have managed to prove any wrong.