- 28 Apr 2023 15:49
#15272561
I wrote the post that you are replying to here, not @pugsville .
The second mistake is that you are not following your train of thought. You had argued that a fifty percent split was the best idea for divorce.
I then pointed out that the children would benefit more from a situation that resembles the pre-divorce arrangement as closely as possible, in the case of a divorce.
And now you are shifting the goalposts and making it about divorce versus not divorced.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Godstud wrote:False. I am saying that it is optimal to have BOTH parents involved in raising a child, not simply one. I don't see how you could come to that conclusion based on what I said. :?:
I wrote the post that you are replying to here, not @pugsville .
The second mistake is that you are not following your train of thought. You had argued that a fifty percent split was the best idea for divorce.
I then pointed out that the children would benefit more from a situation that resembles the pre-divorce arrangement as closely as possible, in the case of a divorce.
And now you are shifting the goalposts and making it about divorce versus not divorced.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...