Saeko wrote:Ahh... now the guy who can't go five whole seconds without calling someone a "mass rape supporter" suddenly has a problem with ad-hominem attacks. Also, it's not an ad-hominem attack to call into question the credibility of a witness.
No, that's a simple statement of fact.
If you don't like being called mass rape supporter then quit supporting mass rapists. Simple.
Saeko wrote:99% of the incidents you've posted on here were obvious hoaxes or ones where you egregiously misrepresented what really happened.
No, they were not.
They were caught on camera.
Students being harassed were simply exercising their right to be on campus and use open spaces.
Saeko wrote:The UCLA Chancellor is not an objective party.
Indeed, he actually has every incentive to deny any of that happened since his inaction risked opening UCLA up to litigation. It may still happen if it hasn't already.
Saeko wrote: Also, protesting by shutting down public or private services has long been a legitimate form of protest throughout American history. So take your legalistic bitching elsewhere.
No, it has not.
It was not legitimate to take over schools and universities to protest desegregation, for example.
I wonder if you will say that enforcing civil rights law to desegregate schools was "legalistic bitching" too. Or segregation is fine when the ones being segregated are Jewish?