- 25 Jun 2010 10:22
#13426908
Yes, I wrote that and nowhere I have mentioned military expenditure, so stop this stupidity...
Then going by your logic as that food was strictly for military purpose that means there would had hardly been any famine problem in USSR...
And no one is saying it, so stop parroting.
It depends, during the WW2 over 50% of soviet gnp was directed towards war effort. So, going by your logic land lease will still account for around 13-14% again hardly decisive..... Then compare strictly the military expenditure of Germany and Soviet union and not their gdp or gnp and you are only helping my case...
Any way you should know that land lease overall accounted for 7% of GNP of USSR
Yes, I wrote that and nowhere I have mentioned military expenditure, so stop this stupidity...
Then going by your logic as that food was strictly for military purpose that means there would had hardly been any famine problem in USSR...
Military budget & GNP are not the same thing.
And no one is saying it, so stop parroting.
Military budget is a small percentage of GNP.
It depends, during the WW2 over 50% of soviet gnp was directed towards war effort. So, going by your logic land lease will still account for around 13-14% again hardly decisive..... Then compare strictly the military expenditure of Germany and Soviet union and not their gdp or gnp and you are only helping my case...
"Reason has always existed, but not always in a reasonable form." Karl Marx