- 19 Mar 2015 19:57
#14538078
Hi,
I was wondering because of a discussion (read: flame war) with anarchist23 at the I/P-forum why anarchism is naturally on the side of the Palestinians for being the party under occupation. I find it absurd based of my understanding of anarchism and find anarchist23 a fake anarchist but of course I could be wrong because my understanding about anarchism is rudimentary at best.
The general anarchist position does not surprise me, granted, because Israel is in the position power but I'd welcome a detailed explanation. Is the position universal among anarchists, or just among hipster anarchists and people who are just against everything?
I found this article The Palestinian Struggle and the Anarchist Dilemma. Any elaboration? Thanks.
I was wondering because of a discussion (read: flame war) with anarchist23 at the I/P-forum why anarchism is naturally on the side of the Palestinians for being the party under occupation. I find it absurd based of my understanding of anarchism and find anarchist23 a fake anarchist but of course I could be wrong because my understanding about anarchism is rudimentary at best.
The general anarchist position does not surprise me, granted, because Israel is in the position power but I'd welcome a detailed explanation. Is the position universal among anarchists, or just among hipster anarchists and people who are just against everything?
I found this article The Palestinian Struggle and the Anarchist Dilemma. Any elaboration? Thanks.
It's good to be the king