- 07 May 2018 05:59
#14912243
No it's really simple, when you're convicted of violating the espionage act it seems reasonable that should disqualify one from holding public office never mind holding the trust of tax paying voters.
Pants-of-dog wrote:The fact that you focus on this instead of Manning’s actual platform suggest that you do care.
Unless you are going to date Manning, which is unlikely seeing as how Maning would probably not date you, her gender identity has no impact on you whatsoever.
A public single-payer health care system, on the other hand, would impact you and your community by drastically reducing medical costs and drastically significantly improving medical outcomes.
Reducing the US military and its ventures would not only reduce your tax payments, but also stop anatagonising other countries, which would in turn reduce your risk of a terrorist attack.
And abolishing ICE would allow your labour underclass to have a voice and some rights, helping to end their exploitation.
But if you want to spend time thinking about Manning’s genitals instead, you do you.
No it's really simple, when you're convicted of violating the espionage act it seems reasonable that should disqualify one from holding public office never mind holding the trust of tax paying voters.