- 10 Sep 2018 14:09
#14945406
Total bullshit. We do have those sources for Jesus.
1) We have Josephus
2) We have the Gospels and New Testament
3) We have Jesus being referred to significantly as a historical figure in the Talmud...
All three sources are ultimately authored by Jews(including the middle ones),
who generally keep good records of their own history and the sources therefore are pretty reliable.
To say Jesus doesn't have good evidence is frankly extremely anti-semitic.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism
ingliz wrote:@SolarCross
As Oxymandias said, there are non-Islamic sources that are near contemporaneous to the life of Muhammad; sources that we do not have for the historical Jesus.
So for a Christian to deny the historicity of Muhammad (when the existence of a historical Jesus is on even shakier ground) is a tad strange.
You foster unbelief in both.
Total bullshit. We do have those sources for Jesus.
1) We have Josephus
2) We have the Gospels and New Testament
3) We have Jesus being referred to significantly as a historical figure in the Talmud...
All three sources are ultimately authored by Jews(including the middle ones),
who generally keep good records of their own history and the sources therefore are pretty reliable.
To say Jesus doesn't have good evidence is frankly extremely anti-semitic.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism