- 30 Jun 2021 13:52
#15179040
In writing things like the above, you are taking the tactic of daytime TV shows that target low-education audiences.
ex. "You go, girl!" "Gotcha!"
"Challenging" and "calling out" are from a non-intellectual vocabulary that belongs in the stupidity of nepotistic commercial media. It can only help you "win" arguments againt TV characters.
And by recycling talking points, you are forcing your "Ideas" into little pre-prepared boxes of semiotic templates:
ex. "Moving forward, we need to start a conversation about best practices..." Once again, this reveals the origins of all your "opinions" as merely the talking points of powerful people you admire.
So you are being a bit of a Miss South Carolina when you do this.
Using other people's pre-prepared ideas and vocabularies - like you do - makes debating "as easy as ordering pizza." And, unfortunately, just as non-nutritious and just as unoriginal.
....
All you have to offer this thread is your personal feelings, which are obviously strong enough to repel any logic or justice. Your "nice words" are just formula for "winning" some high-school-level emotional debate with "the world."
Like I said, my own personal biases aren't important (in this subject) because I am not in any way part of the atrocities being committed against Palestinians. Let's look at your biases....
"Their economy produces things cheaper than ours, so we need to send them some manufactured viruses to level the playing field." - Freedom and Democracy Inc.
PhantomStranger wrote:...you posed as a victim with your feelings hurt because I challenged you and I called you out...
In writing things like the above, you are taking the tactic of daytime TV shows that target low-education audiences.
ex. "You go, girl!" "Gotcha!"
"Challenging" and "calling out" are from a non-intellectual vocabulary that belongs in the stupidity of nepotistic commercial media. It can only help you "win" arguments againt TV characters.
And by recycling talking points, you are forcing your "Ideas" into little pre-prepared boxes of semiotic templates:
ex. "Moving forward, we need to start a conversation about best practices..." Once again, this reveals the origins of all your "opinions" as merely the talking points of powerful people you admire.
So you are being a bit of a Miss South Carolina when you do this.
Using other people's pre-prepared ideas and vocabularies - like you do - makes debating "as easy as ordering pizza." And, unfortunately, just as non-nutritious and just as unoriginal.
....
Why are you asking me personal questions? How is that relevant to the issues? Its not.
All you have to offer this thread is your personal feelings, which are obviously strong enough to repel any logic or justice. Your "nice words" are just formula for "winning" some high-school-level emotional debate with "the world."
Like I said, my own personal biases aren't important (in this subject) because I am not in any way part of the atrocities being committed against Palestinians. Let's look at your biases....
"Their economy produces things cheaper than ours, so we need to send them some manufactured viruses to level the playing field." - Freedom and Democracy Inc.