- 14 Oct 2022 15:33
#15250906
See -- you're arguing *defensively*, on the side of Jones' *private interests*.
*Is it* for 'the social good', or is it for the *billionaire* wealth.
'Society', in the form of the courts, has said that what Jones does is *not* for the social good.
ness31 wrote:
Jones could argue he does what he does for the social good.
Anyway, this isn’t finished. May sanity prevail.
See -- you're arguing *defensively*, on the side of Jones' *private interests*.
*Is it* for 'the social good', or is it for the *billionaire* wealth.
'Society', in the form of the courts, has said that what Jones does is *not* for the social good.