Unthinking Majority wrote:Except I posted evidence from Columbia University that housing in Cuba sucks.
Not quite.
You posted that there is a housing deficit and that this is due (partly) to a lack of materials. Your source also said this is the same reason why repairs and maintenance are also falling behind.
But this is due to Cuba being a developing country that is dealing with a blockade.
If we were to do the same thing in developed Canada, these problems would not exist. Because we are not a developing country. Or under a blockade.
And I haven't seen any evidence from you that nation-wide public housing works. Except the assumption that barracks expanded to 300 million people would work, without supporting logic or evidence.
Why would it not work?
So the conclusion here is that you will continue to support nationalizing housing, despite there being no real evidence presented on whether it would work and nothing will convince you otherwise and you will continue to make up inaccurate claims to try to show your position is legitimate.
So basically there's no point to having this discussion. Good day.
Not only has public housing shown to be viable, but every market based solution has already been examined empirically and shown to not work.
Or in case of the policy you mentioned, it has bot been applied to housing at all. Or in Canada’s case, is already part of the lender protection regulations.
The weird evidence standards are informative, thiugh.
I have to prove beyond any doubt that military housing can be upscaled to everyone’s use, it has to be prefect, Meanwhile, you guys did not even read your own links.
Go read the Cabrini Green link. You will see why @wat0n does not copy paste any text. It is great if you like lurid true crime, It makes no mention at all of any problem inherent to public housing.