BeesKnee5 wrote:Seriously, to believe now that every scientific body
"Every"? Really?
has been duped does seem rather far fetched.
Not when you understand how every
economics body has been duped by neoclassical liars to advance the policy agenda of rich, greedy, privileged parasites.
Far more likely that they do understand GHG and how it relates to changes in the earths climate.
We know that's not true, as their GHG-based climate models do not make reliably accurate predictions -- even when they are dishonestly tweaked to do so, and the data systematically falsified to agree with them.
As an aside a researcher well known for doubting that Humans have a noticeable effect through greenhouse emissions made a bit of an admission
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2023/09/ou ... published/
"we get an effective climate sensitivity to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 of around 1.9 deg. C."
You (surprise!) disingenuously deleted the first part of the sentence to completely change its meaning, a typical exercise in deceit that is normal, routine, and expected from those pushing the anti-science, anti-truth CO2 narrative. Here is the whole thing: "
If we assume ALL *observed* warming of the deep oceans and land since 1970 has been due to humans, we get an effective climate sensitivity to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 of around 1.9 deg. C." And as it is indisputable that there was an internal cyclical cooling trend ~1940-70, we know for a fact that not all the warming since 1970 can be due to humans.
Whilst their dataset went off the charts
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2023/10/ua ... -90-deg-c/
What do you mean, "off the charts"? The combination of a strong El Nino and extremely -- and very unexpectedly -- high solar activity over the last year and a half pushed temperature fractionally higher than the El Nino peaks of 1998 and 2016. As solar activity was at a sustained, multi-millennial high in the 20th century, it is not surprising that temperatures have recovered to something more like the normal Holocene level following the coldest 500-year period in the last 10,000 years -- which disingenuous anti-fossil-fuel propagandists deceitfully call the "pre-industrial" temperature level.
Meanwhile the Pope has gone all sciency
https://press.vatican.va/content/salast ... 1004a.html
Which should tell you something.
And the British institute of actuaries have decided we've got our maths wrong on the risks
https://actuaries.org.uk/media/qeydewmk ... heissue.io
Likewise.