- 02 May 2009 02:28
#1893295
Alright, I've noted Honi's and Potemkin's approval, and as I've said I agree as well so far.
I have a question though, if implemented, and the first party to propose legislation cannot pass it, and say the next party does, but then misses on their second motion, does this trigger new elections all over again? I'm not for that, we should hold the party elections bi-monthly only, if at all possible.
Their are some other objections by the userbase, but I don't think they are really thinking Gnote's proposal all the way through, because as far as I can tell, this proposal handles them.
I'd also really like to hear from at least Dan, and maybe Dave on this before going forward for sure, unless they just aren't around by say...sometime tomorrow morning-afternoon. If It's at all possible, and we do need to re-vote we really need to strike while the iron is hot I think (or at least still luke-warm).
"When do you ask yourself,
'Maybe everyone else isn't wrong for using the definitions of words; maybe I'm wrong for making up new definitions of words and then using them as crude slurs' -TiG