Why would that be necessary? I'm not talking joint governments here, I'm talking about both parties submitting separate confidence motions simultaneously.
Of course if both motions pass that'd be a problem. Maybe we could flip a coin then.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Dr House wrote:I'm talking about both parties submitting separate confidence motions simultaneously.
Of course if both motions pass that'd be a problem.
Maybe we could flip a coin then.
Demo wrote:In other words, if you can get a government MP to sponser your bill, there is no reason why it couldn't be formally proposed.
HoniSoit wrote:Essentially, it introduces much-needed dynamics to the game in that the non-ruling parties cannot afford to constantly block government-sponsored bills if they wish to introduce their own bills. Now non-ruling parties need to negotiate with the government and support some of its bills in exchange for government sponsorship for their own bills.
Trump still has sentencing. LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM[…]
Current Jewish population estimates in Mexico com[…]
Ukraine stands with Syrian rebels against Moscow- […]